|
A sufficient land base must exist for agriculture to remain viable in
New Jersey. Of the approximately 1.7 million acres of remaining undeveloped
or unpreserved open space in New Jersey, 820,000 acres are actively devoted
to agricultural production. Therefore, New Jersey’s farmland is
in high demand by developers and others with non-agricultural interests.
The Department has set forth in its Strategic Plan a goal of preserving
20,000 acres of farmland per year.
To assist in reaching the 20,000-acre goal, the State Agricultural Development
Committee has developed the Strategic Targeting Project. The project encourages
county agriculture development boards and county planning boards to adopt
comprehensive farmland preservation plans that identify and inventory
existing farmland, coordinate efforts to sustain the agricultural community
within municipal and regional master plans, and generally promote the
expansion of agriculture as an industry that is key to their region and
New Jersey’s economy.
Preservation of land is only one component of preserving New Jersey’s
farmers and agricultural industry. The Department’s approach to
smart growth coordinates farmland preservation efforts with economic development
strategies at the county and municipal levels.
The Department’s Agricultural Smart Growth Plan includes comprehensive
proactive strategies that link the land, products, processing and workforce
with marketing opportunities. The plan encourages proven traditional measures
as well as innovative approaches, such as clustering, using alternative
wastewater treatment systems to balance the need for both preservation
and growth. The plan also opposes large lot zoning and downzoning, two
practices that permanently remove the land from agricultural production
at an accelerated rate, undermine preservation programs, and erode a farmer’s
equity. These actions have a direct, negative impact on the retention
of farms and farmers by severely reducing land values and farmland landowner
equity. The plan also recognizes long-term land value appreciation as
a factor in the continued viability of New Jersey farms. The maintenance
of equity is a key concern for farmers, who use their land’s value
as collateral for operating and production loans.
In December of 2004, the Township of Jackson in Ocean County adopted an
ordinance creating a 600 foot buffer on both sides of segments of the
Toms River, prohibiting all development, including agricultural uses and
forestry. A 300 foot buffer limiting development is protected around most
wetlands by the current Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP)
regulations. However, clearing land and erecting structures exclusively
for agricultural purposes is not considered development by the CMP. The
300 foot buffer limits development on over 72 acres per mile of stream
segment wetlands. Increasing the wetland buffer to 600 feet increases
the land area affected by land use restriction to over 145 acres per mile
of stream segment wetlands. Although the CMP permits an increased level
of protection beyond its minimum standards, we question whether it has
been appropriately applied to expand these buffer zones.
The Department of Agriculture’s Smart Growth Working Group has developed
a Planner’s Tool Kit that will provide municipalities and counties
with “hands-on” tools to assist with the implementation of
the objectives and strategies of the Agricultural Smart Growth Plan.
The Highlands Act signed in August 2004 divided the 800,000-acre Highlands
region into two areas: a preservation area, where development would be
strictly regulated and a planning area, where development would be monitored.
A Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council was charged to prepare
and implement a regional master plan for the entire Highlands region.
With lessons learned by the agricultural community in the Pinelands, the
Highlands law included a significant exemption for agricultural and horticultural
activities and related development in the preservation area. Agricultural
development and activities in the preservation area are separate and apart
from the strict regulations that will be imposed upon major development
in the preservation area. Points of particular importance to the Highlands
region are as follows:
The Highlands Water Protection and Planning Council includes a farmer
member.
The Garden State Preservation Trust (GSPT) appraisal comparison language
was amended and will be based upon the regulations and zoning that existed
as of January 1, 2004, effective for the life of the GSPT. This amendment
helps provide equity protection for farmers statewide who are enrolled
in the preservation program by requiring that the appraisals for the acquisition
of land or development rights be based on the regulations and zoning in
effect as of that date. Although the January 1, 2004 appraisal date does
assist in supporting land equity, the agricultural community continues
to encourage a legislative initiative to renew the November 3, 1998 zoning
provision of the GSPT statewide.
The transfer of development rights program for the Highlands region will
be voluntary and consistent with the "State Transfer of Development
Rights Act”, signed into law in March 2004. Financial incentives
are incorporated in the law to encourage towns to identify growth areas.
The regional master plan must include recommended receiving zones and
the capacities pursuant to the State TDR law, before the plan is adopted.
Language to clarify that the law is not intended to be interpreted in
any manner that would lessen the protections afforded by the Right to
Farm Act, and to reaffirm support of the Right to Farm Act and the continued
importance of the agricultural industry to the Garden State.
Supplemental funding of approximately $30 million has been dedicated to
the State Agriculture Development Committee (SADC) for all farmland preservation
programs from the Highlands region.
Farm Bureau has created a “Highlands Working Group” to follow
the work of the Highlands Council, provide support for the farmer member
and provide relevant information on agricultural issues to all members
of the council.
Efforts continue with regard to establishing a dedicated funding source
for farmland preservation efforts in the region.
Other land use concerns of statewide importance continue to come to the
forefront. Impervious cover restrictions are one example. Impervious cover
is broadly defined as any surface that is highly resistant to water infiltration.
However, the definition can vary depending upon the defining entity.
In 2003, the USDA set Impervious Cover limits on lands preserved with
federal Farmland and Ranchland Protection Program monies.
As outside pressures continue to try to cap the amount of impervious cover
on preserved farms, the Department of Agriculture supports a science-based
approach that addresses the issue on a site-by-site basis.
The Highlands Law includes a definition for “agricultural impervious
cover” that takes into account the temporary coverings used on farms.
The law also defines a separate process for agricultural development based
upon the amount of new agricultural impervious cover that will be added
to the farm management unit.
Any agricultural development in the preservation area that adds 3% or
more of new agricultural impervious cover (either individually or cumulatively)
to the farm management unit, will be required to develop and implement
a Farm Conservation Plan. Any agricultural development in the preservation
area that adds 9% or more of new agricultural impervious cover (either
individually or cumulatively) to the farm management unit will be required
to develop and implement a Resource Management Systems Plan subject to
science-based standards, consistent with the goals of the law.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that we, the delegates to the 90th
State Agricultural Convention assembled in Atlantic City, New Jersey on
January 24-26, 2005 endorse the New Jersey Department of Agriculture’s
Agricultural Smart Growth Plan and its five-part approach to land use
and conservation, balanced with economic development initiatives.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we urge the Department of
Agriculture to take the lead in supporting and advancing equitable and
feasible density-transfer methods, including but not limited to clustering,
regional growth zones, PDCs, and TDRs to coordinate preservation planning
in conjunction with growth planning. The Department should also support
and advance the use of current and new wastewater technologies to allow
for the implementation of sound, innovative planning techniques and continue
to build the Planner’s Tool Kit to assist municipalities and counties
with the implementation of the objectives and strategies of the Agricultural
Smart Growth Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, we are opposed to downzoning
or large-lot zoning or zoning that has the practical effect of large lot
zoning, because it fractures and consumes farmland, promotes land-consumptive
sprawl, and adversely affects landowner equity. These zoning practices
are counter productive to the principles of smart growth and should be
discouraged by the Office of Smart Growth.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we recognize that the protection
of farmer landowner equity is as critical to the preservation of agriculture
in New Jersey as the preservation of the land base, and that the cost
of stopping sprawl, preserving open space, and protecting the environment
must be shared by all those who benefit, not placed primarily upon those
who wish to keep their land in agriculture or open space.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we oppose the adoption of restrictive
land use and wildlife management ordinances by any municipality in the
State of New Jersey that are not science based or exceed the powers granted
to those municipalities under existing laws and statutes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we recommend all landowners
involved in all preservation programs (TDR sending areas, Pinelands credit
sending areas, e.g.) be eligible for the same package of benefits or state
incentive programs available through farmland preservation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we urge the Department of Agriculture
to monitor the work of the Highlands Council, participate on the newly
established Highlands Working Group and continue to be engaged in the
effort to identify a dedicated source of funding for farmland acquisition
in the Highlands region.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we encourage participation
of the entire agricultural community in the smart growth planning process
and the ongoing cross-acceptance process. We encourage the Department
of Agriculture to work with Rutgers University, Farm Bureau, the County
Boards of Agriculture, the County Agriculture Development Boards, commodity
groups, community leaders and other interested partners in the implementation
of the Department’s Agricultural Smart Growth Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we continue to oppose any
hard and fast caps on agricultural impervious cover. We support a threshold
trigger for new impervious cover and the use of science-based criteria
which is evaluated on a site-specific basis.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we urge the State Planning Commission
to integrate the Department’s Agricultural Smart Growth Plan into
the State Comprehensive Smart Growth Plan to ensure a balanced approach
that recognizes the importance of agriculture in New Jersey.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we support legislative initiatives
that would renew the November 3, 1998 zoning provision of the GSPT statewide.
|