Rubric for Discussion |
|||
Approaches expectations (1 point) |
Meets expectations (2 points) |
Exceeds expectations (3 points) |
|
| Quality of information: The use of the new information in guiding the work of your assignment | Information shows little or no reflection. OR Information is limited to the main topic; no details/examples provided. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic. Provides at least one supporting detail/example. | Information clearly relates to the main topics & adds new relevant information. Several supporting details provided. |
| Commentary on the work of another(s) | Minimal interaction or response to other participants' and facilitators' comments and/or questions. |
Some response to other participants and to facilitator's comments or questions; |
Responds frequently, encourages & facilitates interaction among participants and the facilitator; |
| Critical thinking | Does not respond to questions |
Critical thinking & reflection are sometimes demonstrated in responses, at Bloom's Taxonomy Levels 1,2 & 3 only. |
Consistently reflective in responses, employing higher level critical thinking skills, more often at Bloom's Taxonomy Levels 4, 5 & 6. |
| BONUS: Sharing an experience or anecdote from your school or district. | Shares information. | Shares information that illustrates or uses the new information. | Shares how the new information will change a practice in your school or district. |
| Totals | |||