>>SPECIAL EDUCATION  >>ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT  >>BERGEN  >>RIDGEFIELD

Local Districts Public Reports
on
State Performance Plan Indicators
2010-2011

A description of how data were calculated regarding the performance of each local school district, for each of the SPP/APR indicators, can be found by clicking the name of the indicator.
 
Data Notes:
NA: This element is not applicable to this district for these grade levels.
N: NO   Y: YES

RIDGEFIELD
BERGEN County
Year 2010-2011
Indicator 1: Graduation Rates - Performance Indicator
Data Source: End of Year Report (Collection Date: June 2010)
Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma

** Indicates no reported data on End of the Year Data Collection
Local Data State Target Met State Target
100.0%  80.0% Y
 
Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rates - Performance Indicator
Data Source: End of Year Report (Collection Date: June 2010)
Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school
 

** Indicates no reported data on End of the Year Data Collection
Local Data State Target Met State Target
0.00% 4.6% Y
 
Indicator 3: Assessment - Performance Indicator
Data Source: Assessment and Adequate Yearly Progress Data
A. District/charter school met the State minimum "n" size and met the State's AYP objectives for progress for the disability subgroup. YES
B. Participation rate for children with IEPs in a regular assessment with no accommodations; regular assessment with accommodations; alternate assessment against grade level standards; alternate assessment against alternate achievement standards
Grade Span Local
Data
NCLB
Target
Met NCLB
Target
Grade Span Local
Data
NCLB
Target
Met NCLB
Target
3-5 Grade LAL 100.0% 97.0% Y 3-5 Grade Math 100.0% 97.0% Y
6-8 Grade LAL 100.0% 97.0% Y 6-8 Grade Math 100.0% 97.0% Y
11th Grade LAL
-
97.0% - 11th Grade Math
-
97.0% -
C. Proficiency rate for children with IEPs against grade level standards and alternate achievement standards
Grade Span Local
Data
NCLB
Target
Met NCLB
Target
Grade Span Local
Data
NCLB
Target
Met NCLB
Target
3-5 Grade LAL 40.8% 79.0% N 3-5 Grade Math 75.9% 83.0% Y+
6-8 Grade LAL 29.7% 86.0% N 6-8 Grade Math 29.7% 80.0% N
11th Grade LAL
-
92.0% - 11th Grade Math
-
86.0% -
-    Did not meet the state NCLB "n" size of 40 for participation and/or 30 for performance
+    Made AYP benchmark target
++  Made Safe Harbor
 
Indicator 4A: Suspension/Expulsion - Performance Indicator
Data Source: Electronic Violence and Vandalism Reporting System(July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010)
Was the district identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities of greater than 10 days in a school year? N
 
Indicator 4B: Suspension/Expulsion - Compliance Indicator
Data Source: Electronic Violence and Vandalism Reporting System(July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010)
Does the district have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs ; and N
(b) policies, procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy and do not comply with requirements relating to the development and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards. N
 
Indicator 5: School Age LRE - Performance Indicator
Data Source: NJSMART (Collection Date: October 15, 2010)

-    * Indicates no reported data on October 15th collection

Note: The LRE data for public reporting were collected on October 15, 2010 and do not include Non-Public School students.

  Local Data State Target Met State Target
A. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 inside the regular class 80% or more of the day (Local data must be equal to or greater than State Target) 71.8% 44.0% Y
B. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 inside the regular class less than 40% of the day (Local data must be equal to or less than State Target) 17.6% 19.0% Y
C. Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 served in public or private separate schools, residential placements, or homebound or hospital placements (Local data must be equal to or less than State Target) 2.7% 8.0% Y
 
Indicator 7: Pre-School Outcomes - Performance Indicator
Data Source: BDI-2 Data Manager


NIC: Indicates "Not in Cohort"
- : Indicates the number of survey responses were too low to yield meaningful interpretation of the data
Outcome A: Percent of preschool children aged 3 through 5 with IEPs who demonstrate improved positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) Local Data State Target Met State Target
1. Of those preschool children who entered or exited the preschool program below age expectations in Outcome A, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program.
NIC
73.8% NIC
2. The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome A by the time they exited the program.
NIC
71.7% NIC
Outcome B: Percent of preschool children aged 3 through 5 with IEPs who demonstrate improved acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/ communication and early literacy) Local Data State Target Met State Target
1. Of those preschool children who entered or exited the preschool program below age expectations in Outcome B, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program.
NIC
63.4% NIC
2. The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome B by the time they exited the program.
NIC
49.8% NIC
Outcome C: Percent of preschool children aged 3 through 5 with IEPs who demonstrate improved use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs. Local Data State Target Met State Target
1. Of those preschool children who entered or exited the preschool program below age expectations in Outcome C, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program.
NIC
62.0% NIC
2. The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome C by the time they exited the program.
NIC
58.2% NIC
Indicator 8: Parent Involvement - Performance Indicator
Data Source: Survey Report
Percent = # of respondent parents who report schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities divided by the total number of respondent parents of children with disabilities times 100

NIC: Indicates "Not in Cohort"
-  : Indicates the number of survey responses were too low to yield meaningful interpretation of the data
Local Data State Target Met State Target
NIC
82.6% NIC
 
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - Compliance Indicator
Data Source: NJSMART (Collections 2008, 2009, 2010) and Fall Surveys ( October 2008, October 2009, October 2010)
Has the district been identified for disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification? N
 
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Compliance Indicator
Data Source: NJSMART (Collection Date: October 15, 2010)
Has the district been identified with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification? N
 
Indicator 11: Child Find - Performance Indicator
Data Source: NJSMART (Collected on October 15, 2011 for the period July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011)

Although the data for indicator 11 were collected on October 15, 2011, the time period of collection reflects the referrals and evaluations completed during the 2010 - 2011 School Year.

Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 60 days or state established time line

*: Indicates no reported data on October 15th collection
*** : 0 students reported
****: All reported evaluations were delayed for valid reasons
Local Data State Target Met State Target
83.3% 100.0% N
 
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition - Compliance Indicator
Data Source: NJSMART (Collected on October 15, 2010 for the period July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010)

Although the data for indicator 12 were collected on October 15, 2011, the time period of collection reflects the referrals and evaluations completed during the 2010 - 2011 School Year.

Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays

*: Indicates no reported data on October 15th collection
*** : 0 students referred from Part C to Part B
**** : No Eligible students
Local Data State Target Met State Target
***
100.0% ***
 
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition - Compliance Indicator
Data Source: Special Education Monitoring System
Percent = [(# of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the studentís transition services needs. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority) divided by the (# of youth with an IEP age 16 and above)] times 100.

NIC: Indicates "Not in Cohort"
Local Data State Target Met State Target
NIC
100.0% NIC
 
Indicator 14: Post Secondary Transition Outcomes
Data Source: Post School Outcome Survey
NIC: Indicates "Not in Cohort"
  Local Data State Target Met State Target
A. Percent enrolled in higher education = [(# of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school and were enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school) divided by the (# of respondent youth who are no longer in secondary school and had IEPs in effect at the time they left school)] times 100.
NIC
45.0% NIC
B. Percent enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school = [(# of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school and were enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school) divided by the (# of respondent youth who are no longer in secondary school and had IEPs in effect at the time they left school)] times 100.
NIC
74.0% NIC
C. Percent enrolled in higher education, or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment = [(# of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school and were enrolled in higher education, or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment) divided by the (# of respondent youth who are no longer in secondary school and had IEPs in effect at the time they left school)] times 100.
NIC
84.0% NIC