New Jersey Statewide Navigation Bar
NJ Office of the Attorney General Home
 
 
 
L&PS home page contact us news headlines about us frequently asked questions library employment opportunities available grants proposed regulations
 
For Immediate Release:  
For Further Information Contact:
December 4, 2003


Office of The Attorney General
- Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General
Division of Criminal Justice
- Vaughn L. McKoy, Director

 
Peter Aseltine
(609) 292-4791
 
 

Attorney General Harvey Seeks Documents Detailing Influence of Special Interests on Epa's Dismantling of Clean Air Protections

 

TRENTON - Attorney General Peter C. Harvey and top legal officers from five other states and the District of Columbia today submitted federal Freedom of Information Act requests to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Energy and the White House Council on Environmental Quality for documents relating to EPA's drafting of a new rule that will drastically undermine the New Source Review program under the Clean Air Act, increasing air pollution and related health problems in New Jersey.

In October, New Jersey, thirteen other states, the District of Columbia and various municipalities filed a pending lawsuit against the EPA in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit seeking to block the new rule, which is scheduled to take effect December 26.

The FOIA requests ask for all communications on the new New Source Review (NSR) rule – not included in the public record – between the agencies and a wide variety of sources, including utilities, energy lobbyists and other government agencies. Attorney General Harvey said the states are seeking to reveal the full extent to which private energy interests influenced the drafting of the new rule.

"The Bush Administration claims to have acted in the public interest when it drafted this new rule that guts longstanding clean air protections and threatens the health of our children," said Governor James E. McGreevey. "Our requests under the Freedom of Information Act will pull back the curtain, so we can see who is really pulling the levers, namely the special energy interests."

"Rulemaking should be based upon objective facts and should aim to improve the human condition," said Attorney General Harvey. "In this case, EPA's new rule was clearly based on a private agenda, not a public record of factual information. Therefore, we are demanding that EPA disclose all communications it has received from energy companies and industry lobbyists. The public is entitled to know how the Bush Administration took its cues from special interests, rather than the air quality experts who explained the harm that this new rule would cause to our children and our environment."

"Not only has the Bush Administration blatantly shown its contempt for our basic environmental laws with its New Source Review rollbacks, it has also betrayed the public's fundamental right to know how these rules were influenced and developed," said New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Bradley M. Campbell. "If special interests held the head seat at the drafting table, now is the time for full disclosure."

The FOIA requests seek communications from Vice President Cheney's Energy Task Force, the U.S. Department of Energy, The Edison Electric Institute, The Utility Air Regulatory Group, The National Energy Policy Development Group, The Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, First Energy Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Southern Company, Cinergy Corporation, American Electric Power Service Corporation, Dynegy Midwest Generation Inc., Illinois Power Company and Hunton & Williams LLP.

The other states joining New Jersey and the District of Columbia in the requests are Connecticut, Illinois, New York, Maryland and Wisconsin.

"The new rule effectively nullifies New Source Review by allowing the country's dirtiest power plants and other major sources of pollution to avoid longstanding requirements to install new pollution controls when making any physical or operational changes that increase emissions significantly," said First Assistant Attorney General Edward M. Neafsey.

EPA has created a broad exemption that provides that where equipment is replaced with equipment that performs the same basic function and does not exceed 20 percent of the cost of replacement of the "process unit" of which it is a part, it will be considered "routine maintenance, repair or replacement" exempt from NSR. The definition of "process unit" is so broad as to encompass an entire production facility.

For example, at a typical 1000 megawatt power plant with a replacement value of $800 million, the new rule would exempt as routine maintenance any plant upgrades and modifications that cost less than $160 million in any year, even if emissions increase. Moreover, a power company could rebuild an entire generating unit over time in 20-percent increments without installing pollution controls, which can reduce air pollution by up to 95 percent.

The new rule represents the Bush Administration's most blatant attempt to subvert the Clean Air Act. It particularly threatens the health of residents in New Jersey, who are subjected to air pollution generated by upwind power plants. The rule will result in more smog, more acid rain and more asthma and respiratory disease in New Jersey.

# # #

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
bottom navigation graphic
departmental: oag home | contact us | news | about us | faqs | library | employment | divisions, programs and units | services from a-z
statewide: njhome | my new jersey | people | business | government | departments | search
 
Copyright © State of New Jersey

 

New Jersey Home My New Jersey People Business Government Departments New Jersey Home Contact Us Privacy Notice Legal Statement more news More Highlights