Mapping_Methodology.doc
The purpose of this document is to
provide the users of the NJDEP State Owned, Protected Open Space and Recreation
Areas (NEWSTATE) shapefile with a detailed description of the numerous mapping
methodologies and data limitations associated with the data file. Included are
descriptions of the original mapping project, interim mapping methodologies and
current mapping procedures.
Original
Mapping Project:
The foundation of this State owned and
protected, open space data set originated with the generation of an ArcInfo
coverage called Open91. Its data generation began in 1989 and was digitally
released in 1991. Its initial purpose
was to provide Natural & Historic Resources in DEP with a manageable,
graphic inventory of state owned and protected open space in New Jersey.
Original
source map information:
All State-owned, protected, open space boundary lines were taken
from hand-drafted
delineations as they appeared on in-house 1:24000 USGS paper topoquads. These hand-drafted delineations mapped by the Divisions of
Parks & Forestry or Fish & Wildlife varied greatly with regard to degree of accuracy, level of
completeness & mapping methodology. In many cases, updates to these paper topos had been made
sporadically over the years by
different individuals with no documentation of the sources used or dates
revisions were made.
Original
mapping methodology:
The boundary lines from the above mentioned paper source maps were
transferred to
a newly acquired set of DEP standardized base maps,1986 1:24,000
photoquads.
Mylar sheets were overlayed and registered to each photoquad. Each boundary line segment was then manually transferred to the mylar
overlay matching the same cultural and physical
features evident on the paper map (e.g.,roads, watercourses, ditches).
Aerial photos were also examined to refine
the placement of numerous boundaries
poorly depicted or omitted on the source, but
evident on the photoquad image; boundaries such as, watercourse meanders, hedge
rows and old field lines. If a boundary
line did not follow a visible feature on the source map or photoquad, it was
locally fit based on surrounding features
common to both sources.
Original mapping criteria:
All State protected open space parcels appearing on
in-house topos were
mapped. Where the boundaries of two adjacent
open space parcels (mapped by
different divisions) overlapped, one was
arbitrarily selected over the other to
avoid confusion in parcel coding and visual presentation. It was not important at that time to
demarcate interior ownership boundaries
of existing protected open space parcels;
discrepancies could be resolved in the future
if need be.
Original mapping accuracy & data limitations:
These hand-drafted topoquad lines were 2nd or 3rd
generation depictions; their accuracies were unknown. Their systematic transfer onto the 24,000 photoquad enabled them
to be entered into the GIS without further corruption and possibly with some
positional improvement. These
delineations were intended to provide the foundation for a statewide, visual,
inventory of existing
protected, open space to aid in future
acquisition strategies. It was never intended to be a substitute for survey
quality line placements or deed ownership. Lines were inked with a 000 pen and
then manually digitized. Digital proof plots were generated for each quad and
compared to the original mylar delineations; all digitization errors greater
than a line width(10ft.)were corrected.
Interim Mapping Methodologies:
After 1991,
keeping pace with new computer technologies, the mapping methodologies changed
significantly. The 1991, 1:12000 quarter-photoquads became the new standard
base map. The parcel boundaries of most new acquisitions were obtained from
current tax book maps; the in-house topos were no longer used. In addition, all
interior lot lines were drafted and digitized. New attributes were added to
record block, lot and municipal affiliations.
Tax
map delineation evolution:
Initially,
individual block and lot lines were photocopied from individual tax map sheets then
re-scaled to fit 1991, 1:12000 quarterquad base maps. These lines were
reoriented to match the image features on the quarterquads. Next, the lines
were drafted onto mylars registered to the quarterquads, labeled with block/lot
numbers then manually digitized into the GIS.
Then in 1993, electronically published tax maps were made available and 1: 12000 digital
ortho-photoquads could be accessed in ArcInfo. Tax maps were then converted to
tiff files, and rectified to the digital orthophotoquads. Once RECTIFIED,
individual lot lines could be drafted
on screen. This new technology replaced the re-scaling, drafting on
mylar and manual digitization steps; it greatly improved the efficiency of the
mapping process.
Data
Limitations:
Boundary line accuracy of tax maps are
unknown. Their depictions are less than
“reasonably” accurate but they improved when re-drafted onto 1:12000 photo base
maps using coincident features. Placement further improved when rectified on
screen to 1:12000 1991 and later, 1995 1:12000 orthophotos.
Current
Mapping Methodologies:
Since 1995, the bulk of acquisitions are entered into the GIS
using a certified survey of the
property boundaries. The ArcInfo Cogo program facilitates the
incorporation of deeds and surveys. Much effort is made to enter data within a
year of the purchase. Tax map lines are utilized only if a survey does not
exist.
Survey
lines:
When surveys are available, a COGO program converts a CAD file of
the parcel to an ARCINFO coverage polygon. A Nad83 or Nad27 NJSPC certified
survey is the best available source with regard to shape and positional
accuracy. Non-NJSPC certified surveys
provide the best parcel shape but not position. They are repositioned to fit
the features present on the on-screen image. If interior lot lines are omitted
on either type of survey, then tax map lot lines are added using the “best fit” method mentioned above.
Tax
map lines:
The appropriate pages from a current tax
book are scanned, saved as tiff files and brought into the GIS and rectified
using an ARCinfo/ArcMap program and 2002 digital imagery. Only the property
lines that compose the acquisition are digitized on screen and added to the
coverage. Attributes are added and
coverage is cleaned or built.
Current
Mapping Accuracies & Data Limitations:
To date, over 6200 parcels have been
added to the State open space coverage. The goal is to map all newly acquired
open space parcels in a timely fashion with the best information available. It
cannot be stressed enough, that due to the dynamic nature of land acquisition
business, and time delays associated with the acquisition process itself, this
GIS inventory will always be incomplete. Boundary adjustments to the earlier
drafted parcels will not occur unless inconsistencies /overlaps arise between
those delineations and new acquisitions. At that time, if possible, positional
problems will be resolved as well as any tax record inconsistencies. The
program does not actively update static areas.
It is too expensive to survey or too time consuming to go through old
tax books or deeds to update boundary lines. Where the drafted boundaries of
two adjacent parcels misalign (because they were mapped independently of each
other or from different sources), the lines from the "better" source
are always used. Surveys will always
take precedence over all other map sources.
NJSPC surveys take precedence over all other types of surveys.